Caution: this list does not reflect 'quality', or 'best' unless you assume that a lot of people citing and criticising obviously flawed content published in a journal would demonstrate that that journal is a high quality outlet. All it does is indicate how frequently articles in that journal were cited over a predetermined period of time. It doesn't tell us anything about the reasons for the citations. I included journals I found in JCR's medical ethics as well as its ethics list. - Not that it should matter, but for the sake of it, I co-edit 2 and 6 on this list.
| Abbreviated Journal
Title |
{2014} Total Cites |
Impact Factor |
| AM J BIOETHICS |
1363 |
5.288 |
| DEV WORLD BIOETH |
238 |
2.054 |
| HASTINGS CENT REP |
988 |
1.684 |
| J MED ETHICS |
2845 |
1.511 |
| BMC MED ETHICS |
404 |
1.495 |
| BIOETHICS |
982 |
1.483 |
| NEUROETHICS-NETH |
205 |
1.311 |
| J EMPIR RES HUM RES |
365 |
1.25 |
| PUBLIC HEALTH ETH-UK |
190 |
1.182 |
| J LAW MED ETHICS |
1189 |
1.097 |
| HEALTH CARE ANAL |
357 |
0.958 |
| KENNEDY INST ETHIC J |
285 |
0.867 |
| J MED PHILOS |
675 |
0.851 |
| ACCOUNT RES |
173 |
0.826 |
| J BIOETHIC INQ |
165 |
0.747 |
| NANOETHICS |
146 |
0.703 |
| MED HEALTH CARE PHIL |
448 |
0.7 |
| CAMB Q HEALTHC ETHIC |
344 |
0.682 |
| MED LAW REV |
153 |
0.65 |
| THEOR MED BIOETH |
325 |
0.537 |
| INT J FEM APPROACHES |
48 |
0.486 |
| REV ROM BIOET |
112 |
0.462 |
| ETHIK MED |
56 |
0.326 |
| ACTA BIOETH |
45 |
0.074 |
